March 2009 (system or crisis?) 
lot or talk above the crisis. But the answer is difficult: we have a systemic crisis
or at least a
banking crisis? Or is our political system in the past 60 years have become too lazy to sedate? Hard to say. For sure is that politicians and their control acted too late and have failed is. It is, ultimately, almost gross mischief when politicians "
as elected officials to" sit in the
supervisory boards of the largest companies and adhere to the decisions of directors and responsible. Grotesk is it then (seeing as a few days ago in Plus Minus) these politicians say unanimously (by the way of all
major parties !): How should we (the policy) the directors control the daily business, when not even the
Board its products (eg derivatives can
explain)?
Where, but any reasonable thinking person immediately to the question why so many of our MPs in federal and state seats in the various supervisory bodies? Why are they so intent on (alleged) claim to power, if this - precisely because of the lack of knowledge - very quickly reverses into its opposite? In fact, only one be crucial in clear thinking and cool heads: entitlement to power
and
money. But our politicians - especially our
Kanzleuse - and their international colleagues in this long period without disaster of global significance only to sleep. The first big bang (
subprime crisis), they woke up and fell just once from her chair. After they have sorted their bruises and complained extensively, came the first, yet uncoordinated responses. In
Press the Financial Times Germany all come with bad to very bad reviews of it, whether or
Merkel Ratzinger,
Seehofer or
Steinbach . And the policy as a whole
abgewatscht after the coalition committee
shone in his last meeting of inaction and indecision, and thus in effect a six-month campaign
opened. Not a bad result could mean a cynic
.
catastrophic, I think as an independent journalist. Such action is directed against the interests of the people and against the will of the people. The
Financial Times Germany writes quite right in their "
little criticism of the state criticism " that the
'skepticism of the market fundamentalists in the political arena is often just clever propaganda. It is only interested in ideological redistribution from bottom to top hedge! .
Where, ultimately, still the question of what kind of crisis we have actually. Can say so explicitly (or will) the yes or no. Also
Mr. Dudenhöfer swung his opinions from left to right and back and as soon that no one is behind. Neither the pan even with his opinion! And why should we
OPEL actually pay taxes that are going to land allegedly anyway in Detroit. Also:
OPEL has paid taxes in Germany just to get (almost 50 million euros), but paid a cent. For this they require a few billion and would destroy 3,700 jobs, but nothing to give
own merits.
Mr. Wagoner the word seems to have internalized
business, but not the necessity of giving
! To bring the (surely inconvenient) truth to the point: OPEL, with its rather small vehicle production
not relevant to the system! Also, nationalization is not the means of salvation, Kanzleuse. On the contrary, they have a terribly bad light fall on our country. And unhappy memories.
With my today's "word on Sunday," I wish you (and our country) as a beautiful and peaceful evening. Many greetings and wishes a nice Buen Camino you Lothar
"Project Germany - Day 8
lot or talk above the crisis. But the answer is difficult: we have a systemic crisis or at least a banking crisis? Or is our political system in the past 60 years have become too lazy to sedate? Hard to say. For sure is that politicians and their control acted too late and have failed is. It is, ultimately, almost gross mischief when politicians " as elected officials to" sit in the supervisory boards of the largest companies and adhere to the decisions of directors and responsible. Grotesk is it then (seeing as a few days ago in Plus Minus) these politicians say unanimously (by the way of all major parties !): How should we (the policy) the directors control the daily business, when not even the Board its products (eg derivatives can explain)? Where, but any reasonable thinking person immediately to the question why so many of our MPs in federal and state seats in the various supervisory bodies? Why are they so intent on (alleged) claim to power, if this - precisely because of the lack of knowledge - very quickly reverses into its opposite? In fact, only one be crucial in clear thinking and cool heads: entitlement to power and money. But our politicians - especially our Kanzleuse - and their international colleagues in this long period without disaster of global significance only to sleep. The first big bang ( subprime crisis), they woke up and fell just once from her chair. After they have sorted their bruises and complained extensively, came the first, yet uncoordinated responses. In Press the Financial Times Germany all come with bad to very bad reviews of it, whether or Merkel Ratzinger, Seehofer or Steinbach . And the policy as a whole abgewatscht after the coalition committee shone in his last meeting of inaction and indecision, and thus in effect a six-month campaign opened. Not a bad result could mean a cynic . catastrophic, I think as an independent journalist. Such action is directed against the interests of the people and against the will of the people. The Financial Times Germany writes quite right in their " little criticism of the state criticism " that the 'skepticism of the market fundamentalists in the political arena is often just clever propaganda. It is only interested in ideological redistribution from bottom to top hedge! . Where, ultimately, still the question of what kind of crisis we have actually. Can say so explicitly (or will) the yes or no. Also Mr. Dudenhöfer swung his opinions from left to right and back and as soon that no one is behind. Neither the pan even with his opinion! And why should we OPEL actually pay taxes that are going to land allegedly anyway in Detroit. Also: OPEL has paid taxes in Germany just to get (almost 50 million euros), but paid a cent. For this they require a few billion and would destroy 3,700 jobs, but nothing to give own merits. Mr. Wagoner the word seems to have internalized business, but not the necessity of giving ! To bring the (surely inconvenient) truth to the point: OPEL, with its rather small vehicle production not relevant to the system! Also, nationalization is not the means of salvation, Kanzleuse. On the contrary, they have a terribly bad light fall on our country. And unhappy memories. With my today's "word on Sunday," I wish you (and our country) as a beautiful and peaceful evening. Many greetings and wishes a nice Buen Camino you Lothar "Project Germany - Day 8 
0 comments:
Post a Comment